Blown Rim
#1
Super Modest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,466
Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 4,620 Times
in
2,123 Posts
Blown Rim
Well, got our Santana out for its first ride this year and found that the rear 40º Fir rim has blown. Rim has about 6,000 miles on it and has been in use with a heavy team/bike weight of 440# with Conti 28c tires pumped to 130#. Tandem has had a rear disc for all but a 1,000 miles or so, so it's unlikely that sidewall wear caused it.
Luckily, we have a spare 40º rim that I can lace on to it but our total team/bike weight is now 350# so it may be time for new wheels.
Suggestions?
image by trsnrtr, on Flickr
Luckily, we have a spare 40º rim that I can lace on to it but our total team/bike weight is now 350# so it may be time for new wheels.
Suggestions?
image by trsnrtr, on Flickr
__________________
Keep the chain tight!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
8 Posts
That sounds like a lot of pressure in a 28 mm tire. Maybe you can run at a less-extreme pressure now that the team weight is down. I blew out a rear rim once at a weak spot (near the valve hole) when I insisted on overinflating my 25 mm tires on my half-bike. Lucky for me, Velocity replaced it under warranty.
Congratulations on the huge weight loss. Perhaps you were just riding a 120 pound bike that you have replaced with a 30 pounder?
Congratulations on the huge weight loss. Perhaps you were just riding a 120 pound bike that you have replaced with a 30 pounder?
#3
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,303
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times
in
372 Posts
Looks like it happened right at where the rim is welded. I'd argue it's a manufacturing defect.
One other observation, though, from the nicks on the rim in the top of the picture, it looks like that rim has been on the pavement at some point, perhaps riding out a flat. The rim manufacturer might point to that.
One other observation, though, from the nicks on the rim in the top of the picture, it looks like that rim has been on the pavement at some point, perhaps riding out a flat. The rim manufacturer might point to that.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#4
Super Modest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,466
Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 4,620 Times
in
2,123 Posts
I'm not worried about warranty. I've got a spare rim to lace on to the hub. And, yes, the rim has been ridden after a blowout on a steep descent.
As for pressure, since my wife and my weight loss, I was going to run 115-120 which I was pumping when I found the rim was blown.
As for pressure, since my wife and my weight loss, I was going to run 115-120 which I was pumping when I found the rim was blown.
__________________
Keep the chain tight!
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Probably a combination of high pressure exposing a defect or damage at the joint. Whatever force made the nicks on the rim may have weakened the weld as well. If it were me I would lace up the spare rim ride it. We have put 10,000-15000 miles on rear wheels with 28s at 130 psi on Velocity Dyads and rim brakes with no failure. We don't brake in the rain a lot and team weight is about 290.
If you want an excuse for new wheels then yes you need new wheels. Better yet losing that team weight I think you deserve new wheels.
If you want an excuse for new wheels then yes you need new wheels. Better yet losing that team weight I think you deserve new wheels.
Last edited by waynesulak; 03-21-14 at 03:03 PM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 11,016
Bikes: Custom Zona c/f tandem + Scott Plasma single
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times
in
11 Posts
Have blown/cracked a few rims since we started riding in tandem in 1975.
We are a rather light team (under 250 lbs) and most rear rims have lasted into the +/- 20,000 mile range.
Have had some front rims go 50,000 miles.
Others experience may vary . . .
Pedal on!
Rudy and Kay/zonatandem
We are a rather light team (under 250 lbs) and most rear rims have lasted into the +/- 20,000 mile range.
Have had some front rims go 50,000 miles.
Others experience may vary . . .
Pedal on!
Rudy and Kay/zonatandem
#8
Super Modest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,466
Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 4,620 Times
in
2,123 Posts
Thanks a lot for the info. I'm going to lace up the spare rim and then start shopping for a set of wheels. It's a plan.
__________________
Keep the chain tight!
#9
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,534
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
Looks like a combination of rim wear and overinflation. That's definitely rim wear and the way the whole rim seems to be starting to sag outward is not good. Our 300# team touring with full luggage runs 115 lbs. on 28mm tires. Rim manufacturers inflation pressure limits approximately coincide with those recommended by tire manufacturers. Running a disc on an old worn rim means that you can't feel the rim pulsing in the rim brake lever, which is how I tell when it's time to retire a rim.
#10
Senior Member
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 65
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hi,
6K miles, congratulations on wearing something out. Great job and you should celebrate, with new wheels.
I always take great pride in wearing out a tire, a chain, cassette or wheels.
We blew out a Rolf rear wheel on the 2nd to the last day of Cycle Oregon this year and I feel we got our miles and years out of that set of wheels.
As long as you did not crash and you can afford to replace it, you have achieved.
Upgrade and keep riding.
6K miles, congratulations on wearing something out. Great job and you should celebrate, with new wheels.
I always take great pride in wearing out a tire, a chain, cassette or wheels.
We blew out a Rolf rear wheel on the 2nd to the last day of Cycle Oregon this year and I feel we got our miles and years out of that set of wheels.
As long as you did not crash and you can afford to replace it, you have achieved.
Upgrade and keep riding.
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 90
Bikes: 2017 BMC Road Machine, 2014 Niner Air 9, 2022 Niner RLT, 2020 Niner Jet 9, 1993 Santana Rio, 1996 Santana Sovereign, 1996 Santana Picante,2005 Santana Team Scandium
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, got our Santana out for its first ride this year and found that the rear 40º Fir rim has blown. Rim has about 6,000 miles on it and has been in use with a heavy team/bike weight of 440# with Conti 28c tires pumped to 130#. Tandem has had a rear disc for all but a 1,000 miles or so, so it's unlikely that sidewall wear caused it.
Luckily, we have a spare 40º rim that I can lace on to it but our total team/bike weight is now 350# so it may be time for new wheels.
Suggestions?
image by trsnrtr, on Flickr
Luckily, we have a spare 40º rim that I can lace on to it but our total team/bike weight is now 350# so it may be time for new wheels.
Suggestions?
image by trsnrtr, on Flickr
Mike
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Royal Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,236
Bikes: 2006 Co-Motion Roadster (Flat Bars, Discs, Carbon Fork), Some 1/2 bikes and a couple of KTM's
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Rims do fail, many reasons why and several ways to fail. While I don't like stating it, rims (not wheel assemblies) are pretty much a wear item or expendable. They see a lot of stresses. Some are high quality materials, some lesser quality materials. Regardless, under heavier teams, ourselves included, they don't last forever.
If the hubs are good quality, buy two new rims and relace both ends. If the hubs are not higher end, go for new wheels. If you need or do go with new boutique wheels, shop carefully, there are a few horror stories or two one this website. Myself, I would have no looking back to build some DT or Chris King hubbed wheels, with a rim of our choice, and would consider possibly a custom drilled carbon fibre rim as part of the process.
PK
If the hubs are good quality, buy two new rims and relace both ends. If the hubs are not higher end, go for new wheels. If you need or do go with new boutique wheels, shop carefully, there are a few horror stories or two one this website. Myself, I would have no looking back to build some DT or Chris King hubbed wheels, with a rim of our choice, and would consider possibly a custom drilled carbon fibre rim as part of the process.
PK
Last edited by PMK; 03-23-14 at 05:11 AM.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 9,579
Bikes: '65 Frejus TDF, '73 Bottecchia Giro d'Italia, '83 Colnago Superissimo, '84 Trek 610, '84 Trek 760, '88 Pinarello Veneto, '88 De Rosa Pro, '89 Pinarello Montello, '94 Burley Duet, 97 Specialized RockHopper, 2010 Langster, Tern Link D8
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1607 Post(s)
Liked 2,216 Times
in
1,103 Posts
IMHO, the rim is not failing at the joint, but rather the edge is separated from the rim just below the joint. The sidewall of the rim looks to be well worn, almost concave in appearance. If so, the thickness of the wall is significantly worn down to the point where the edge is separated from the wall at the worn outer edge of the side. This is a result of a very aggressive brake pad in combination of a machined braking surface (?) which reduces wall thickness to achieve the flat surface. IOW, worn out! Lot of assumptions in this analysis but if they are all right, then the analysis could be too!
#15
Clipless in Coeur d'Alene
^^^ Chicken and egg scenario. Can't say if the weld popped first or if was the rim-edge.
The rim does look quite worn for having only 6000 miles on it (OP). Plus, a team of 440# probably should have been using a bigger tire (ie: 32mm) at lower pressure than 130psi. I wasn't able to find the specs for Santana's FIR wheels, so no idea what the rim's max psi rating is.
The rim does look quite worn for having only 6000 miles on it (OP). Plus, a team of 440# probably should have been using a bigger tire (ie: 32mm) at lower pressure than 130psi. I wasn't able to find the specs for Santana's FIR wheels, so no idea what the rim's max psi rating is.
#16
Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 39
Bikes: Co-Motion Java, Rivendell Sam Hillborne, Trek 4300, Bridgestone XO 3, Colnago Superissimo
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Certainly a tandem workhorse, but not immune to circumferential cracks. We discovered one nearly all the way around on our rear wheel two months ago, somewhere between 4,000-5,000 miles. We run Marathon Supremes (28x50) at about 50 psi supporting a ready to ride combined wight of bike, gear and riders of about 340 lbs. Velocity US quickly offered us a choice of replacements. Chose the Atlas (a bit wider). Velocity also sent us a second if and when we wanted to change out the front. While we did use a supplemental V brake a bit when the Dyad was new, an Avid BB7 did 99% of that wheel's rear braking.
#17
Super Modest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,466
Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 4,620 Times
in
2,123 Posts
^^^ Chicken and egg scenario. Can't say if the weld popped first or if was the rim-edge.
The rim does look quite worn for having only 6000 miles on it (OP). Plus, a team of 440# probably should have been using a bigger tire (ie: 32mm) at lower pressure than 130psi. I wasn't able to find the specs for Santana's FIR wheels, so no idea what the rim's max psi rating is.
The rim does look quite worn for having only 6000 miles on it (OP). Plus, a team of 440# probably should have been using a bigger tire (ie: 32mm) at lower pressure than 130psi. I wasn't able to find the specs for Santana's FIR wheels, so no idea what the rim's max psi rating is.
__________________
Keep the chain tight!
#18
Senior Member
Riding on the rim after a blowout down a steep descent throughout in a complete new set of variables! If you hit a sharp object, pot hole, anything that could stress the rim you could have damaged the rim to the point that a stress riser was created that was just waiting to cause a crack. At your former weight and the pressure that you were running and the fact that it was ridden with a flat tire is enough to indicate that a failure was imminent.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Certainly a tandem workhorse, but not immune to circumferential cracks. We discovered one nearly all the way around on our rear wheel two months ago, somewhere between 4,000-5,000 miles. We run Marathon Supremes (28x50) at about 50 psi supporting a ready to ride combined wight of bike, gear and riders of about 340 lbs. Velocity US quickly offered us a choice of replacements. Chose the Atlas (a bit wider). Velocity also sent us a second if and when we wanted to change out the front. While we did use a supplemental V brake a bit when the Dyad was new, an Avid BB7 did 99% of that wheel's rear braking.
#20
What??? Only 2 wheels?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,434
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times
in
232 Posts
A few points. I find it hard to swallow that 130psi as compared to, say, "just" 120psi would cause that problem. Anything engineered properly, even a lightweight-by-design bike component, has a bigger safety factor than that. I've run 145psi on 23mm clinchers on a solo bike and never seen that sort of thing.
That it is near the "weld" is insignificant unless the joint wasn't aligned well at manufacture, in which case that would be a manufacturing defect. (Jobst Brandt's book The Bicycle Wheel says that the joint needn't be welded at all, but should be pinned for alignment. He says that there can be half a ton or more of force holding the wheel together, and describes the experiment of cutting a rim into many sections then lacing up a wheel which could not be pulled apart.) The rupture on that wheel does not appear to start right at the joint anyway.
In most cases a wheel will fatigue from load by the spokes pulling through or the inner surface of the rim developing longitudinal cracks. (We had a Matrix rim on the rear of our tandem start cracking at a spoke nipple.)
So without knowing anything more about the rim's history I'd say it is either a defect or the result of lots of braking, which suggests lots of use of course.
That it is near the "weld" is insignificant unless the joint wasn't aligned well at manufacture, in which case that would be a manufacturing defect. (Jobst Brandt's book The Bicycle Wheel says that the joint needn't be welded at all, but should be pinned for alignment. He says that there can be half a ton or more of force holding the wheel together, and describes the experiment of cutting a rim into many sections then lacing up a wheel which could not be pulled apart.) The rupture on that wheel does not appear to start right at the joint anyway.
In most cases a wheel will fatigue from load by the spokes pulling through or the inner surface of the rim developing longitudinal cracks. (We had a Matrix rim on the rear of our tandem start cracking at a spoke nipple.)
So without knowing anything more about the rim's history I'd say it is either a defect or the result of lots of braking, which suggests lots of use of course.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
#21
Senior Member
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 1,971
Bikes: Custom 650B tandem by Bob Brown, 650B tandem converted from Santana Arriva, Santana Noventa, Boulder Bicycle 700C, Gunnar Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
The angle at which the tire wall attaches to the rim also effects the outward pressure on the rim. A narrow tire attaches at a nearly vertical angle while a fat tire is angled away from the rim or in an extreme case nearly 90 degrees to the rim wall. While fatter tires are usually run at lower pressures the problem is that the increase in stress due to the change in angle rises at a faster rate than the reduction of stress due to the reduction in pressure. Below is a quote from another thread that explains it in more detail:
Influence of tire pressure and width on the rim stress
The tour Forum discussion about the effects of different tire widths
and Luftdrücke was on the load on the rim. This particular case was
about whether a MTB rim as the a 50mm tire with max. Designed 4bar, is
a 25mm tire to cope with 8 bar pressure can be bent without them too.
Since I has not left in peace, I once counted something: The bending
stress on the rim sidewalls consist primarily of two components, the
direct internal pressure acting on the flanks, and the horizontal
portion of the circumferential force of the tire. The latter one has
to think about this: The tire section is simplified seen a ring. When
this pressure is evenly under tension. Because of the "ring" but the
lower part is open and there is held together only available via the
rim, the rim must take this tension there. Interesting for the bent-up
in the case only the horizontal component of the voltage at the
junction of tire rim. This is the exit angle of the sidewall of the
rim depends. All horizontal forces are not neglected because they
hardly relevant for the question have. The calculation is based only
on one edge of the rim on the other hand, the burden of course
identical. Exposure to peripheral force: The exit angle α the sidewall
can be calculated geometrically: with b = B = inside rim width tire
width
The tangential force is calculated according to the boiler formula as
follows: p = tire pressure (1 bar corresponds to 0.1 N/mm2) D =
Outside diameter of the rim horizontal component FU_X obtained cos α
available via:
Calculation of the resulting force in the middle of the edge: the area
of the inside of the rim edge A is: h = height inner rim flank This
results in the resultant force Fp_R:
Calculation of the moment on the rim: at the foot of the Cross, the
forces lead to a bending moment to the outside: It all looks a mess
out in a formula, you get this:
h = internal height rim flank
p = tire pressure (1 bar corresponds to 0.1 N/mm2)
B = Tyre width
D = Outside diameter of the rim
b = internal width of the rim
means of this formula, you can now compare what you nicely with the appropriate
tires and air pressure of its rim so exacts. For ease, I've also
created a small Excel document to calculate.
The tour Forum discussion about the effects of different tire widths
and Luftdrücke was on the load on the rim. This particular case was
about whether a MTB rim as the a 50mm tire with max. Designed 4bar, is
a 25mm tire to cope with 8 bar pressure can be bent without them too.
Since I has not left in peace, I once counted something: The bending
stress on the rim sidewalls consist primarily of two components, the
direct internal pressure acting on the flanks, and the horizontal
portion of the circumferential force of the tire. The latter one has
to think about this: The tire section is simplified seen a ring. When
this pressure is evenly under tension. Because of the "ring" but the
lower part is open and there is held together only available via the
rim, the rim must take this tension there. Interesting for the bent-up
in the case only the horizontal component of the voltage at the
junction of tire rim. This is the exit angle of the sidewall of the
rim depends. All horizontal forces are not neglected because they
hardly relevant for the question have. The calculation is based only
on one edge of the rim on the other hand, the burden of course
identical. Exposure to peripheral force: The exit angle α the sidewall
can be calculated geometrically: with b = B = inside rim width tire
width
The tangential force is calculated according to the boiler formula as
follows: p = tire pressure (1 bar corresponds to 0.1 N/mm2) D =
Outside diameter of the rim horizontal component FU_X obtained cos α
available via:
Calculation of the resulting force in the middle of the edge: the area
of the inside of the rim edge A is: h = height inner rim flank This
results in the resultant force Fp_R:
Calculation of the moment on the rim: at the foot of the Cross, the
forces lead to a bending moment to the outside: It all looks a mess
out in a formula, you get this:
h = internal height rim flank
p = tire pressure (1 bar corresponds to 0.1 N/mm2)
B = Tyre width
D = Outside diameter of the rim
b = internal width of the rim
means of this formula, you can now compare what you nicely with the appropriate
tires and air pressure of its rim so exacts. For ease, I've also
created a small Excel document to calculate.
Last edited by waynesulak; 03-25-14 at 10:16 AM.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 249
Bikes: 2015 Apollo Syncro tandem, 2006 Scott CR1 SL (still a beastie race bike), 1993 Trek T200, 2006 Fuji Absolute Le, 2000 Thorn Club Tour
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
hi,
6k miles, congratulations on wearing something out. Great job and you should celebrate, with new wheels.
I always take great pride in wearing out a tire, a chain, cassette or wheels.
We blew out a rolf rear wheel on the 2nd to the last day of cycle oregon this year and i feel we got our miles and years out of that set of wheels.
As long as you did not crash and you can afford to replace it, you have achieved.
Upgrade and keep riding.
6k miles, congratulations on wearing something out. Great job and you should celebrate, with new wheels.
I always take great pride in wearing out a tire, a chain, cassette or wheels.
We blew out a rolf rear wheel on the 2nd to the last day of cycle oregon this year and i feel we got our miles and years out of that set of wheels.
As long as you did not crash and you can afford to replace it, you have achieved.
Upgrade and keep riding.