Originally Posted by
LesterOfPuppets
Many aspects is as far as I can go. I'm not sure how you come up with "every respect".
Beauty, component durability and "repairability" are a couple of qualities that, off the top of my head, come up in the Paramount's Win column
I'll second the endorsement of the older machine's durability and repairability, as well as it ability to limp home with a broken spoke. For the average utility, recreational, or even club rider, a well-made high-end classic bike still makes a lot of sense. As for number of gear ratios, since I don't need or carry any really tall or low gears, I can easily get the tight ratio spacing I crave over my low-40s to mid-90s range with a 2x7 1.5-step or a 3x8 half-step-plus-granny setup.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069