View Single Post
Old 12-18-09, 03:13 PM
  #19  
mtnbke
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,511

Bikes: '92 22" Cannondale M2000, '92 Cannondale R1000 Tandem, another modern Canndondale tandem, Two Holy Grail '86 Cannondale ST800s 27" (68.5cm) Touring bike w/Superbe Pro components and Phil Wood hubs. A bunch of other 27" ST frames & bikes.

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 110 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by RFC
Yes, that is the limiting factor (without going to some geeky overly extended stem).
On my 63cm Cannondales I have to use some Salsa stems that are nearly vertical in rise to bring the bars up. I've got two of 'em (one on the tandem and one one the 3.0 frame). I've never seen 'em elsewhere but they are much much more stable (rock solid) as compared to a Nitto Technomics. However, the "look" is frankenbike. No bike should look like that. Even though they look completely 'geeky' the bars are still below the saddle height, but its just so...wrong.

In comparison I just love to look at the 27" C'dale now (68.5cm). It justs looks like a real bike, albeit with little clown wheels.
mtnbke is offline