View Single Post
Old 12-21-09 | 11:25 AM
  #44  
russdog63's Avatar
russdog63
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 2
From: Kennewick Washington

Bikes: Holdsworth Professional(1984), Medici Pro Strada (mid 80's), Team Raliegh 753 (special build 1987?), Univega Ultraleggera (early 90's or late 80's)

I am with EjustE. Ride what you are comfortable with. Personal preferences and riding styles are going to lead riders to stray from conventional sizing rules. I am 6'1" and rode a 59cm bike for 20 plus years. During that period I developed my preferences for seat height and stem height. I developed a preference of having my handlebars 3" to 4" below seat level. This was because I did lots of climbing and liked climbing with my hands on the hoods or the upper portion of the handlebar. I also developed a preference for having less stem exposed. This made for less stem flex during climbing and sprinting.
A couple of years ago I set up this bike. It is 56cm Univega Ultraleggera. I am now a convert to using smaller frames. I love riding this bike.

vjp commented on RFC's bike maybe being too small. I don't see any problem with RFC getting a comfortable fit on that bike. My only problem is with the amount of stem showing. It would be a little to flexy for my preference.
I can however see the sense in the fistful of seatpost rule. If you have to ride with your seat clear down to the top tube you probably have to stand on your tip toes to straddle the top tube.

Last edited by russdog63; 12-21-09 at 11:35 AM. Reason: add on
russdog63 is offline  
Reply