View Single Post
Old 01-01-10 | 12:34 PM
  #11  
a_phat_beat's Avatar
a_phat_beat
My grammar sucks.
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
From: NYC

Bikes: Merlin Extralight, Colnago Crystal, Serotta Club Special

Originally Posted by FlashBazbo
I HATE carbon seatposts for this reason. Carbon is really ill equipped for this role. Tacx undoubtedly works, but why bother with it? There is no functional advantage to a carbon post (because, to be strong enough, it is built to be as heavy as an aluminum post).

My new frameset came with a carbon seatpost. After 25 miles, it started slipping (as I knew it would). I'm changing it out for a Thomson. I will save 40g and I will have a seatpost that I never ever have to think about.
At this point, I have to agree with you. There is no functional advantage whatsoever, as far as I can tell. The only reason I see anyone getting a carbon post is for aesthetic purposes. I've already applied the compound so I should be ok for now, however, If ever the time comes for the need of a new post... I'm going with Thompson.
a_phat_beat is offline  
Reply