Originally Posted by
Square & Compas
In terms of FRAP, yes while it does happen when and if in a court of law situation, there could be bias against cyclists. But I have yet to see a cyclist cited for riding 4' off of the curb. I know if I ever was I would fight the ticket in court. I do not think this law discriminates against cyclists. In fact i have conducted my own experiment, you're gonna love this because it is real world proof that FRAP is not a bad thing.
I did this on the same strech of roadway, for the same distance with the same level of traffic. Used 2 cameras mounted to my bike to record the ride on this stretch of roadway. One pointed behind me and one ahead of me recording video. This way I had the correct number of motor vehicles who passed me. I conducted the experiment for 5 business days each, Monday through Friday twice a day at the same times each day. The first week I practically hugged the curb. I was pretty much 6" off of the curb the whole way. The second week I was more left of the curb, in the "tire track" of the travel lane, about 2 to 3' off of the curb.
The results were as follows: The first week, 6" off of the curb I was buzzed, passed too close, honked at, yelled at, etc. I was even brushed by a mirror. The second week I was passed within at least 2' if not more, was not yelled at, was not brushed, was not honked at.
And one more thing, a lot of the drivers were the same people on their morning or afternoon commute.
The results of my test tell me one thing. FRAP works when used properly.
Your test is interesting, but it has nothing to do with FRAP.