Originally Posted by
sehsuan
hmm. you just reminded me of something that i read in my junior high school (for 13 year olds) days... if you get 1 liter's of marbles, and 1 liter's worth of marbles (or 1/2" steel bearings if you don't call them marbles in your country)... and mix both portions into a large container, you would not get 2 liters' volume worth of the mixture. kind of like trying to dissolve a large amount of sugar or salt into water - you just get a marginal increment in the volume taken up. i think there's a concept called "granularity" (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granularity ) which might apply to our discussion. the salt and water could represent all the random sized items we're cramming into a pannier...
while this analogy seems bad (i know, it's me...) consider the likelihood of using a pannier like lonepeaks (i use ortlieb backrollers, FYI...) it should take somewhat lesser volume to cram in multiple small ziploc bags into an ortlieb rather than fit a single package into a zip compartment and waste the extra space.
while i am starting to use my ortlieb backroller for my daily work commute WITHOUT my bike for waterproofing - i sure can't imagine getting a lone peak and NOT being able to guarantee my things will be bone dry - and fitting in my 12" sized work laptop. i belong to the category of people who would love to get things that are truly multipurpose - although i'd appreciate further organization abilities within my pannier - but hey, that depends on the programming that i have inside my head, wouldn't it? one more thing i like is that i can hitch up one of my ortlieb panniers as a backpack for sightseeing while guaranteeing that everything inside's all dry while i can't really imagine doing it with a lonepeak - not sure if that option even exists or not.
another caveat i might foresee is that in a zip-compartment scenario (no, i've never inspected nor studied a lonepeak before) is that there might be scenarios where the more fragile items have to be packed somewhere near the bottom of the entire pannier - all it takes is for me to be slightly forgetful before i squish the item(s) into a mess of goo.
p.s. i'm currently a B&B type of tourer, so please do take my points into your context
one more thing - i'm not sure if lonepeaks will allow you to add additional pannier hooks on top - i just added one more pair of clips to both my ortlieb backrollers so that:
1) the load is more spread out across 4 points instead of 2;
2) i don't need to constantly shift the hooks' position using allen keys when i'm using my ortlieb pannier carrying system (backpack adapter)
3) there's always some form of redundency in case any one snaps
4) anyone (airport crew, porters, myself?) lifting a heavy pannier by two sets of loops that attach to the clip releases will spread out the stress of the lifting over 4 points instead of 2...
one last thing - i will never need to face the hassle of cleaning off road dirt from between zipper safter a wet ride, as compared to rolltops, nor have the need to further add the cost for a set of rain covers to the purchase price of the lonepeaks by themselves. smooth fabrics (i chose the ortlieb classic PVC - i'm not a PVC fan but neither am i an anti-PVC activist) are much easier to wipe clean instead of cordura-like fabrics.
All great points and exactly the kinds of criticisms I was looking for!
I am not all corned about carrying capacity. When I crossed the US my biggest problem was weight and not capacity. I had more than enough room to carry all of my gear and then sum and thats with all of the cheap bulky gear that has since been upgraded for this trip. The Lone Peaks will have a few liters less space than the Transit Epics I used on that trip but overall not a big difference I feel. With that in mind I am not too afraid of covering the important stuff with plastic bags. Trash compactor bags take up virtually no space and are big enough to cover the entire main compartment using only one if I felt like it. The Lone Peak Panniers also weigh significantly less than Ortlieb's so thats another plus.
You seem to be a lot more concerned about waterproofing than me which is another valuable criticism. However, if I may add another point against the Ortliebs, their method of waterproofing can be spoiled rather easily as I saw happen to two of by riding partners. One of them took a small spill on his bike which, while he was just fine afterwards, eat a decent size whole in his expensive Ortliebs and completely ruining their waterproof advantage. My other friend stupidly left some small food items at the bottom of of of his bags in which a raccoon quickly ate through to get at. Now I know Ortliebs have a great rep for being tough, as do many panniers I might add, small holes and punctures virtually eliminate their most attractive feature. If a pair of Lone Peak or similiar cordura panniers receive a hole or puncture they can be stitched up with just about any fabric laying around and the plastic lining on the inside can be cheaply replaced. Ditto by the way for bunggi cord attachment systems but thats another argument. If you were really concerned about waterproofing and just didnt trust trash bags for whatever reason you could buy Ortlieb dry bags that fit into a standard pannier for a fraction of the price of a whole Ortlieb pannier!
Another problem I have with Ortlieb is their attachment system, though apparently very strong and such, is highly specialized and I am unlikely to find replacement parts in the third world if something were to go wrong. Several other brands like Lone Peak and Axiom use simpler systems that work well enough but are more easily field repaired.
I never use my panniers off of the bike for sight seeing. I have what is essentially a dry bag with shoulder straps that I carry with me. It looks a just like a normal backpack but it packs down small and I use it to keep my cloths dry in my panniers as an added bonus. I find it is much more comfortable than wearing a pannier slung over a shoulder all day. To each their own though. I'll try and find a link for the product but I bought it here in Korea so no promises.
I am not entirely sure I understand your argument about something getting squished at the bottom of the pack. Would it get stuck in the zipper? If anything the zippers would help because the whole pack could be opened up at once without unloading everything.
Good points were made earlier about the reliability of zippers vs. Top loading panniers. Very worthy of consideration I think. However, zippers are simple machines, I believe anyways, and the advantage of not having to unload everything and have lots of organization pockets with no real weight penalty seems a good trade off to me.
Being able to clean off the Ortliebs is also another advantage to PVC bags vs other fabrics. However, I kinda like the looks of a dirty bag so its, forgive the pun, a wash for me.
How much stuff do you guys in the Ortlieb camp carry that needs to be waterproofed? In general, the things I need to be dry at the end of the day are:
1: sleeping pad
2: sleeping bag
3: clothes
4: a few small electronics (Camera,ipod,ect.)
What else is there? My tent usually goes on the back rack in its own dry bag that I bought to replace the normal bag it came with. Sometimes I put my sleeping bag or pad on the top rack as well, also in dry bags. Cloths go in my dry bag/back pack. All the rest of the stuff can get as wet as it wants too i.e. cooking stove and pans, bike tools, spare parts, ect. I am guessing the difference is that other people carry more expensive electronics than me like laptops, GPS, and SLRs. Expensive stuff like that I can certainly understand being paranoid about.
Maybe I just dont ride in the rain as much as other? Most of my tours tend to be relatively open ended. Meaning, that if the weather is bad that day I just stay in the tent and read or otherwise take a rest day. In Asia where I will have access to cheap accommodations on a fairly regular basis I cant imagine riding all day in too terrible of weather for too many days in a row.
Let me know what you think about this line of reasoning, pretty different approaches to the same problems.