View Single Post
Old 01-07-10, 02:17 AM
  #25  
fogrider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: fogtown...san francisco
Posts: 2,276

Bikes: Ron Cooper, Time VXSR, rock lobster, rock lobster, serotta, ritchey, kestrel, paramount

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've ridden carbon for years...then I discovered scandium. I also have a serotta ti legend. I agree that engineering plays a big part to the longevity and ride quality but material does has inherent qualities. I also agree that weight is important, but it just depends. if you're going to commute 5 miles, will an extra couple of pounds matter? if you're going on a lunch time training ride, don't you want an extra weight to get you into shape? I think it was Greg Lemond that said to start the season on a steel bike, transfer to a ti bike and get on a carbon frame for the tour.

I love it when people tell me how important it is to have a lightweight carbon bike and then slap on a hug seat bag.

as for the ti vs carbon question, I still have a bike with a steel fork, but how many of you ride on carbon forks? just about every high end bike has a carbon fork! carbon is great!
fogrider is offline