Originally Posted by Helmet Head
That's right, which is why,
technically, 21208, does not violate the rights of cyclists.
However, I would like to see that challenged, because I believe, in practice, it does.
Consider
the following scenario presented by John Forester on rec.bicycles.soc in 1994:
This doesn't show the qoute from John Forrester, Serge, but if you took out the reference to the bike lnae, and stuck in "as far to the right as practicable", the cyclist would still be in legal trouble.