View Single Post
Old 01-28-10 | 04:30 PM
  #145  
FallsApart
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Seattle

Bikes: 90's Bianchi Campione (currently in pieces), 80's Schwinn Chicago singlespeed, Neuvation w/ 5100 SRAM Force

Originally Posted by urbanknight
Gay is perfectly acceptable to describe a *****exual person, but not acceptable in expressing dislike or disapproval.
+1

That's sort of the central part to the discussion, here. The word "gay" didn't morph - it was that the feelings we as a culture feel toward gay people was bundled into the word and applied to other things we feel similar distate for. So when you use the word negatively, you participate in that tradition of hate, no matter the posturing you do. The point is not to cull the word gay out of your vocab, its to cut its negative use. "He's gay" meaning "he's a *****exual" is fine, right - but "he's gay" meaning "he's an a*s" is not.

Anywhoo. That's a lot. In the end, get the triple if you need it, don't if you don't. Right? Consensus?
FallsApart is offline  
Reply