Originally Posted by
achoo
>>
Conclusions:
There is no evidence that cycle helmets reduce the overall cyclist injury burden at the population level in the UK when data on road casualties is examined. This finding, supported by research elsewhere could simply be due to cycle helmets having little potential to reduce the overall transport-related cycle injury burden. Equally, it could be a manifestation of the “ecological fallacy” where it could be conceived that the existence of various sub-groups of cyclists, with different risk profiles, may need to be accounted for in understanding the difference between predicted and realised casualty patterns.
<<
Well, that clears things up.
Not.
Big words confuse you, hmm?
What is the "overall cyclist injury burden"? What is the "overall transport-related cycle injury burden"?
Two syllable words are challenging, aren't they?
Where's any comment on the efficacy of bike helmets?
I think it just went flying over your head...