Originally Posted by jazzy_cyclist
My take so far is that Hurst departs from VC insofar as it has become an ideological fixation for some. In other words, taking the lane is reasonable in some cases, but not in others (e.g., high speed, heavy traffic). He does seem to caricaturize VCists as those who are *always* opposed to bike lanes, and taking the lane under *all* conditions...
He does have a good sense of humor, but I'm not all that impressed so far. I was really looking to find something that went in depth into VC and all of its subtle implications.
You may find something, somewhere that goes into the alleged subtle implications of VC. Good luck on trying to find on the Internet any hint of subtly from obdurate VC proseltyizers/ideologues.