View Single Post
Old 02-14-10 | 04:31 PM
  #58  
bikesdirect_com
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by TejanoTrackie
Just because the government is stupid is no reason for a responsible manufacturer to be so as well. Either BD is just interested in following the letter of the law in order to avoid lawsuits from ignorant consumers, or they are total idiots themselves and think that a rear brake is the best way to stop a bicycle quickly. They should either ship a FG bike without any brakes with a warning sticker in a dozen languages declaring that this bike is for "track use only" or supply it with 2 brakes. I don't buy the "meeting a price point" arguement either. There are other cheap bikes out there that cost less, are of comparable quality and provide 2 brakes.

I do not write the CPSC rules
lots of bikes do not allow the code: but I try to make sure ours do
__________________
http://www.bikesdirect.com

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." – Mahatma Gandhi
bikesdirect_com is offline  
Reply