Originally Posted by koffee brown
This article reminds me of a Simpsons episode when the judge asks the lawyer if he has anything of substance to add as evidence, and the lawyer says something like "well, I have plenty of speculation and conjecture".
It's an article that doesn't really give us anything, just adds to the usual mix of "did he or didn't he". What's the point?
Koffee
To show the difference that the general public sees between the likes of Bonds, McGuire et al. and LA, not to insinuate anything regarding Armstrong's own habits. I think you missed something.