View Single Post
Old 02-24-10 | 01:41 PM
  #9  
goodtimes5
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by chaulky61
The Cannondale would be a more aggressive frame compared to the OCR - is that what you want? You may find the OCR more comfortable for the type of riding that you do.

Also, is the stock crank on the OCR a triple? May want to consider a compact or 53 - 39. You can buy an Ultegra (6600) crank and BB for under $200 if you shop around. You would notice the weight savings.
I am looking for more aggressive. At the time of purchase of the OCR, I had no idea what different geometries meant.

Yes, the OCR is currently a triple. The crankset on the Cannondale is a 53-39. If I'm going to spend $200, I'd rather add it in towards the cost of the Cannondale frame that includes an unused crankset. What kind of weight savings do you guess I'd get from the OCR/Truvativ triple crank to the Cannondale/carbon double crank?

Originally Posted by shautzy43
Just got my trek 1.5(triple) a month ago and already thinking upgrades, FAIL!!! But hey the metallic lime is pretty sweet xD
Reading bikeforums.net predisposes you to never be satisfied with your bike.
goodtimes5 is offline  
Reply