Thread: SRAM Apex
View Single Post
Old 02-25-10 | 08:09 AM
  #48  
sykerocker's Avatar
sykerocker
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,429
Likes: 257
From: Ashland, VA

Bikes: The keepers: 1969 Magneet Sprint, 1971 Gitane Tour de France, 1973 Raleigh Twenty, 3 - 1986 Rossins.

Originally Posted by intence
With compact cranks and longer and longer cassettes, the need for a triple becomes less and less. Why have multiple sets of front shifters, cranks, FDs, etc. in you inventory/lineup. There's R&D and production costs associated with a larger lineup.
Don't underestimate the use of a triple crank on a dedicated touring bike. I've normally set mine up with the top two chainrings about the same as I do a double on a road bike, then have an extremely small third chainring for those times when you've got a steep climb and a full pannier load. It's the best of both worlds: Road gearing for the flats plus a built in climber.

While the triple is going to get marginalized (I'm old fashioned, I've never seen the need for a triple on a stripped road bike), it's never going to go away. It's too useful.
__________________
Syke

“No one in this world, so far as I know — and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me — has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”

H.L. Mencken, (1926)

sykerocker is offline  
Reply