Hm. Interesting. Although I was around for the System 10, and I even donated a track bike that had been built with it (the original owner kept the drivetrain parts), I never thought of applying it "full size".
i wonder what the weight penalty is at "full diameter" sizes. You'll have more pins/rollers (which I figure are heavier than just a side plate). Less negative space on teeth?
On the other hand you'd have better wear, quicker chain shifting (although maybe the closer teeth would be harder to shift onto - more ramp action needed), and, of course, fine tuned ratios.
Hm hm hm.
cdr
*Edit* I forgot to add that the higher number of teeth front/back is one reason why pros used huge rings in TTs - 55, 56 was normal. But they'd use a 55x15 in the TT itself, not the 55x12. The 55 helped because a one tooth jump (55x15 to 55x14) had a smaller overall effect on gear than, say, a 53x14 to a 53x13.
Last edited by carpediemracing; 03-05-10 at 11:52 AM.
Reason: old school big rings