Thread: Spoke pattern
View Single Post
Old 03-16-10 | 03:36 PM
  #75  
desconhecido
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 146
Originally Posted by dabac
. . .
But given a reasonably decent measuring device, the only change between loaded and unloaded axle is a reduction of the tension previously registered to the spokes that occupy the space in a rather narrow sector between the hub and the ground.
. . .
That's right. Brandt has suggested, in one of his numerous on-line discussions of this, that an easy way to see which spokes see significant tension change when a bicycle wheel is loaded is to pluck the spokes both loaded and unloaded and see which spokes have a discernible change in pitch. The bottom spokes do, the top spokes do not.

Here is an interesting analysis the results of which agree with Brandt: http://www.astounding.org.uk/ian/wheel/

Of particular interest is the drawing showing deviation from roundness; greatly exaggerated, of course, because there really isn't much deviation from roundness.

Of all the things that have been written here the worst is, "[t]he bottom spokes do nothing to resist vertical load on the hub." That's beyond wrong. It would be nice to know what buildings this person has designed so I could avoid them.
desconhecido is offline  
Reply