Old 03-22-10 | 10:19 AM
  #28  
Road Fan's Avatar
Road Fan
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,196
Likes: 761
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Originally Posted by repechage
One of the problems is the outboard terminous of the spindle, as alluded to, they crank will only fit so far, as the wedge will allow it to go, the point at which the mfg. cuts it off can make a difference, even Campagnolo spindles vary by a millimeter during a given era, its the taper placement in relationship to the bearing contact point that drives the crank placement. The taper and placement are hard to measure without some set ups to assist, in my tool box long stolen I had a device that helped, think of a hinge basically with a ground inside face set, I recall it was 6 inches long or so, it provided a long enough leg to measure the taper through trig, measuring the short section of taper a spindle has without a reference plane is mind numbing.
Yes, the biggest problem I had was to set a consistent point along the taper to measure the end, and that would let me make a comparison with JIS. It was fiddly enough that I saw the need for a fixture to hold everything still.

What is the difference between ISO and old Campy shaping?
Road Fan is offline  
Reply