View Single Post
Old 03-24-10 | 02:53 PM
  #60  
agarose2000
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 2
There is NO way that this can outperform a PB superflash or Mars 3.0.

It claims 250 lumens, but that is almost definitely due to cumulative addition of all the low-powered lights. Each of those lights is going to be a fraction of 250 lumens. I'd be surprised if it even reached 50 lumens per light. The only way this could possibly compare to the superflash is if the batts on the superflash were really run-down and near-dead.

I do like the more "human" shape of the lighting - that's a plus. But I'll take a Mars 3.0 any day over this thing. A single spot uber-bright source that's visible from further away (like a superflash) is more useful to me than a wide spread of low-powered lights that you might not notice until you're right behind.
agarose2000 is offline  
Reply