Originally Posted by
ClarkinHawaii
No, I just thought rigid would be cheaper and used suspension forks would be kaput like mine,
The truth is that this is my workhorse bike that needs fenders and it grates on my soul to have the front fender zip-tied to a fork. The fork I have now is plenty rigid--if it had eyelets for fenders I would be happy with it.
There are a couple of ways around the zipties. One is to use a reflector clamp like
these from Cateye. Measure your fork diameter and find the clamp that works. Relatively cheap and quite secure.
You can also use a shock fender.
SKS Shockblade fenders are easy to mount and do a good job. They don't cover as well as a full fender but they will do the job and don't require stays.
Bikepedia does show that a 94 Hardrock was a nonsuspended bike. The 94 Rockhopper had a fork or perhaps the dealer put one on before you bought the bike. Not that it matters much. You probably don't need a suspension corrected fork because the forks from 94 had 80mm of less of travel and, often, suspension forks were added to unsuspended bikes anyway. A noncorrected fork will make the front end
slightly steeper but I doubt you'd notice much.