Talk about being absurd. Ofc, I refer to the company. Their vehicle hits another road user, and it was their vehicle's fault, and yet THEY demand compensation? That women riding a bike should sue them and not settle for any compensation, but push it to the end. Because she will get more that way because she's right and they're wrong, and they know it.

As for the audacity that company showed by sending those letters, the proper response would be to say that their client caused the collision, and as such all of the expenses and claims are on their client who was driving the vehicle. They very conveniently forgot the fact that their client caused the collision. Not knowing the law or not being accustomed to bike on the road are not excuse. That is the responsibility of the driver to know the law and to drive responsibly as far as others are concerned. And that they said the women couldn't understand it was her fault - maybe they should take a check and test to see is that women fit to drive a vehicle, and can she comprehend road law? If not, she should not have the drivers license in the first place if she can't understand the rules. In that case she is dangerous to all other users of the road, and should be removed from the road as a driver.