Originally Posted by
prathmann
Hiibel clearly allows states to require people to provide the police with their correct name. I didn't see anything in the ruling that extends that to include date of birth, but maybe I missed something or it was covered in another ruling.
Could you clarify where it is specified that a correct birth date must be given upon request?
You are correct that the Hiibel brief did not specifically include birth date in it's text. It was somewhere within one of the referenced cases, maybe even a second layer case. As I recall, there was only one case that included the "providing name and birth date" out of all the ones I looked at. When I get some time, I will try and search it back out.
If it were not for the referenced case I would be more than happy to claim that all a cyclist has to do is give their name.