View Single Post
Old 04-29-10 | 11:24 AM
  #35  
Road Fan's Avatar
Road Fan
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 17,191
Likes: 757
From: Ann Arbor, MI

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Originally Posted by EjustE
If you want a stiff lugged steel frame you are looking at frames build with Tange 1, Ishiwata 019, Columbus SL and Reynolds 753. not sure that you will find anything like this in a sports touring configuration... Maybe an early (pre 80s) Trek, maybe some of the 83+ Triple butted Fujis, might be stiff enough. On the other hand, I am not sure why you see the reason for a stiff frame for 50-100 mile rides...
I don't know how you can say these things. The steel alloys you have mentioned all have the same stiffness, but differing parameters of strength. The tubesets made of these materials all have the same outer diameters, comparing tube for tube and allowing for some very small differences. The tubes mainly differ in wall thickness and i some cases interior surface design, such as using helixes. The 753 alloy is just as stiff as the 531 alloy, but 753 is stronger. 753 tubes have thinner walls than 531 tubes, and hence are more flexy (less resistant to twist or bend) than are the thicker 531 tubes. With equivalent joining, tube sizing, and use of the butting, how could 753 make a stiffer main triangle than 531? It doesn't make sense.

More stiffness can be had (without going to oversize tubes) by using tubes with thicker walls, such as Ishiwata 022 versus 017, Columbus SP versus SL, and Reynolds 531 ST versus 531C or 531 Pro. The most obvious way to get a stiffer frame is to go to oversize tubing with short chainstays. Then the price point shifts to favor aluminum.
Road Fan is offline  
Reply