View Single Post
Old 05-02-10 | 07:04 PM
  #32  
mihlbach's Avatar
mihlbach
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,656
Likes: 145
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by preston811
So we have mihlback [sic] recommending WT despite never owning one or any BD bike, and Gyeswho you said you feel a Surly frame would be a downgrade? I'm just curious how, besides the braze-ons/eyelets. Is it really the perfect bike, no downsides at all? How is the paint on BD bikes? The paint on the Surly is pretty solid in my experience.
Its absurd to insist that one has to own a bike to have an informed opinion about it. In fact, owners can sometimes be a poor source...often rationalizing their own purchases gets in the way of making an unbiased judgement . At any rate, after viewing this forum for nearly five years, there is more than enough evidence available to back up my statements and recommendations. The WT and Steamroller are more or less equivalent bikes. The fact that the WT is hundreds less makes it a better buy, unless you really depend on your LBS for sizing and mechanics. In that case, you may be better off with the Surly. Thats really all there is to it.

Last edited by mihlbach; 05-02-10 at 07:08 PM.
mihlbach is offline  
Reply