Originally Posted by
njkayaker
No, you aren't sure.
good to see you can understand what I think as well as I can or, are you implying you may know what I'm thinking better than I'm expressing?
Originally Posted by
njkayaker
that doesn't keep you from bring this quite-likely irrelevant point!
wouldn't you agree that there is plenty of evidence of people who were wearing helmets and suffered head injuries? Do those cases make this an irrelevant point?
Isn't the greater issue the impact of someone off the roadway, from a vehicle intended to stay on the roadway?