View Single Post
Old 05-14-10 | 11:54 AM
  #19  
FBinNY
Senior Member
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 39,897
Likes: 3,865
From: New Rochelle, NY

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Originally Posted by Jtgyk
Thanks for the explanation and site.
So the fact that the body of the spoke is smaller in diameter than the threads will allow me to take up the extra 1mm since there is no physical "stop"
(of course at the expense of having fewer threads engaged)?
I'll have to see whether, in practice, this will weaken that particular connection too much and be on the look out for failure at the nipple.
Close, but still no cigar.

The spoke is smaller than the thread, but only by 1/2 the thread height, so the nipple will still jam when it's first thread hits the last thread on the spoke. The extra length available is because spoke companies tolerance their spokes and nipples around the concept of the ideal height being to the top of the nipple, so they leave room for over or under that ideal.

Thread strength is unaffected because the structural part of the nipple is the head (which is why it's important that spokes come well up into it), and the extra thread engagement below the head is meaningless either way. Think of a bolt, you put a nut on the end & and once the thread goes beyond the nut, the arrangement doesn't get stronger or weaker because of bolt above the nut, or unused threads below.

When you get the spokes, thread one nipple down all the way, and that'll show you how far up the spoke can come before you run out of thread.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Reply