Originally Posted by
RockyMtnMerlin
I have only read about half of the pages in the thread. But most of it seems to be focused on Armstrong. Here is what I find most "interesting": the claim that positive test results were covered up via bribery. Now think about that for a minute. That means that not only the head of the UCI had to be paid off, but the lab that did the testing and the technicians therein. IF that is true then the UCI and the whole antidoping effort is a farce.
From what we're told, labs only have a number, they don't have an athlete's name on a vial.