View Single Post
Old 05-24-10 | 05:58 AM
  #13  
jimmuller's Avatar
jimmuller
What??? Only 2 wheels?
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 13,501
Likes: 995
From: Boston-ish, MA

Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10

Now boys, play nice.

Interesting discussion. Of course I figured it would be a can of worms. Though it may have been discussed many times before, I wasn't here to read it then.

I did take a few ideas from all this. Some things would seem to be obvious or at least not surprising. Pure rolling resistance may indeed be lower with skinny, high-pressure tires. Tire design matters. Width and pressure affect what the rider feels.

What isn't so obvious is how that feel translates into real-world speed. A rider who constantly slows over rougher pavement or who tires (no pun intended ) from lifting off the saddle or whose hands go numb may be slower at the end of the ride. So the pure physics of lower rolling resistance may be trumped by the aggregate effect of road quality, bike stiffness, ride length, the rider's resilience, etc. I have read various reports of rolling resistance. I've read about the softer or harder feel of tires. Few discussions connect the feel of the tire to end-of-day speed.

I will continue to evaluate the new 25mm's in those terms.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
jimmuller is offline  
Reply