View Single Post
Old 05-24-10 | 08:11 PM
  #27  
Fasteryoufool
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
From: Texarkana, AR

Bikes: 2016 Giant Escape, Univega Viva Sport, Centurion Sport DLX, Trek 420, Schwinn Sierra, Schwinn Hurricane

Originally Posted by EjustE
Absolutely no scientist will accept data from such a test in a peer reviewed scientific publication. Small sample size and potential variables with individual tires (not to talk about the other variables).

To create a scientific test that would give you results with some statistic confidence and would be acceptable in the academic community, you would need to try at least 5-10 different copies of the same tire (hopefully of different batches and bought from different locations) in 2-3 sizes, and at least 50 different tires. That's 500-1000 tires x $35 = $17.5-30K + time and material and instruments and salaries. Let's round it up to an even $50K, maybe $100K depending on the instrumentation you need. That's why scientists need grands to do their experiments...
A "scientist" is anybody that conducts a scientific evaluation to the best of their abilities. Controlling the variables to as great a degree as possible, and the ability to replicate results are key.

I wasn't speaking of something to be published in a scientific journal, just a method that could possibly give some general insight for your own use.
Fasteryoufool is offline  
Reply