Originally Posted by
RChung
I love that. Thanks oh thanks oh thanks oh thanks.
You said "95-100 rpm". Oh I'm so happy. Could you please look at the rightmost column and tell me exactly how many of the hour records were set at 95-100 rpm? I'll wait.
keep waiting because i'm done here. go ahead, take your hands off the keyboard & do a victory salute, for this may be the only cycling-related victory you might ever get.
ps. save your attempts at humor & don't quit your day job just yet for a career in stand up.
Originally Posted by
RichinPeoria
Originally Posted by
Tulex
I love that you would rather hold him to a specific number he said to win an internet pissing contest instead of seeing that the numbers, while slightly higher, are all in the same close range. And that was actually the point of his statement and the earlier argument. IF you think these people were not aware of their cadence, well, what can I say.
Bottom line, cadence only matters as much as you want to use it. For those that want to get stronger and faster on a bike, it can be used as one of the tools to help achieve that.
donno about you guys, but im done reasoning with him. arguing with him is like arguing with one of these
