Originally Posted by
beerfilter
I think the problem with MUPs in some cities is that the planners think it is a good idea to locate them in scenic areas, around parks, along rivers, and other enticing places that make the MUPs into recreational destinations.
Where I live the MUPs go through industrial parks, warehouse districts and along utterly shadeless marginal areas along highways and water diversion channels. In some places they go through neighborhood alleys and here you see the occasional dogwalker or fitness walker, but they are mainly used by commuter and fitness cyclists (and homeless guys and little gangbanger wannabes. Ah, there's the rub).
I WISH our planners would do more than make bike lanes a recreational destination, as you put it..
The very few that exist here are just that - of little use but to toddle along and look at the scenery.
This is fine for those so inclined, but it does little for those who actually want to get somewhere - like to work, to stores, etc.
Personally I would happily ride through industrial areas, warehouse districts and other marginal areas like highways... since I must traverse such areas to get to work and more than a few other places I might want to go.
Ive been wondering about this all day, actually, i.e. :
Where lies the difference in thinking between bicycles as mere toys/recreation and as serious
transportation.
What does it take to have planners provide for them as the latter (if that is even possible)?