View Single Post
Old 04-25-05, 11:27 AM
  #14  
genec
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by FotoTomas
Running red lights by cyclists is a pet peeve of mine. I do not do it and write tickets to those that blatently do. I have no problem with a slowdown at a stop sign and moving on if it is safe. Red lights are different in my opinion. Most of the "Excuses" I have read in this thread would work for cars as well. As such I do not support the practice and will enforce compliance.

The one that bothers me the most is when a cyclist gets stopped and has no idea why running a red light is against the law for bikes as well as cars. They often feel the law does not apply to them. They find out different. Now that I cycle for work as well as fun I have become MORE attentive to this practice.

I am in the minority. Many of the other officers I know tend to avoid the whole bike situation. Saves them the hassle of writing the ticket and court if that happens.

I will admit my attention to this matter was reinforced when the very first traffic accident I worked was a fatality caused by a cyclist running a red light and hitting a pedestrian, killing them. That was 1975. Just 5 months ago two little girls were killed behind my house when a car ran a red light. Red lights mean stop and I am watching.

Foto, what about lights that don't change for cyclists?
genec is offline