View Single Post
Old 07-13-10 | 03:10 PM
  #66  
invisiblehand's Avatar
invisiblehand
Part-time epistemologist
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,870
Likes: 3
From: Washington, DC

Bikes: Jamis Nova, Bike Friday triplet, Bike Friday NWT, STRIDA, Austro Daimler Vent Noir, Hollands Tourer

Originally Posted by genec
The sad thing with straight number statistics is that they don't reflect the actual cause and effect situations.
Undoubtably.

Originally Posted by The Human Car
Agreed on the risk compensation. IMHO fatalities that were due to the lack of seat belts or air bags (in years past) are being replaced by higher speed distracted driving crashes.
Just to re-emphasize, I concur that distracted driving is a real problem. I think that if we tell people to not "text and drive" or similar without changing the fundamental decision to pay attention to one's driving -- or designing roads that allow people to do so -- that people will simply substitute to other distractions/daydreaming/risks.

As a side note, casual conversations with some engineering types at Ford suggested that based on laboratory tests by far the biggest effect on safety in a crash is wearing a seat belt. So other external changes offseting a dramatic increase in distracted driving may be an unlikely explanation of the data.
__________________
A narrative on bicycle driving.
invisiblehand is offline  
Reply