View Single Post
Old 07-23-10 | 06:43 AM
  #10  
merlinextraligh's Avatar
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,812
Likes: 1,234
From: Jacksonville

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Originally Posted by zzyzx_xyzzy
They ride bikes with quite short chainstays for whatever reason. When you shorten the chainstay you also have to shorten the front center to keep the weight distribution from getting too rear biased. So short TT/long stem.
This doesn't make sense. The chain stay length doesn't change as the frame size goes up. For example all Cervelo R3SL's have 399 mm chainstays regardless of the lenght of the top tube from 48cm to 61cm. By your theory the larger frame sizes would be horribly out of balance.

Moreover the weight distribution is going to be the same regardless of whether the reach to the bars is made up of 56cm of TT and 12cm of stem, or 58cm of TT and 10cm of stem.

What is different is that the bike with the 56 cm top tube typically has a shorter head tube, and than the bike with 58cm top tube.

Hence my point, the smaller frame tends to facilitate a more aero position, i.e. more drop from seat to bars.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Reply