Old 07-24-10 | 01:45 PM
  #105  
under18cyclists's Avatar
under18cyclists
JR^2
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
From: Rochester,Ny

Bikes: 2004 giant ocr1

Originally Posted by OrionKhan
What is the difference?
1. Stage 3: A crash that causes the peloton, including the yellow jersey and Contador, to stop. Cancellara, with Andy in tow, drill it and gain a minute on Contador, who was stopped through no fault of his own.

2. Stage 15: Andy Schleck attacks Contador, Sanchez, and Menchov in the mountains. Contador and the other react to cover the attack. Andy drops his chain, through what appears to be rider error. Note that Andy was still on the bike pedaling when they went by, but was definitely slowed trying to figure out what was going on. Contador and the others attack.

If you remove those two stages, at no point has Andy Schleck out ridden Alberto Contador. In stage 3, Andy made a larger time gain than Contador did in 15. So it boils down to the prologue and ITT. Contador out road Schleck in both. How are Contador's tactics cowardly any more cowardly that Schleck's? If you don't like Contador, just say it and try to have a quantifiable reason for doing so. Don't pick event out of a 21 stage race, and ignore others, to support you feelings.
His positioning is his fault.

Even if is was Schlecks fault he dropped the chain, Contador still shouldn't have attacked, pushed hard and set the pace. Contador had to go AROUND Schleck, what did he think. Oh Schleck just decided to stop when he had a gap on me for no reason?
under18cyclists is offline  
Reply