View Single Post
Old 07-25-10 | 09:54 AM
  #10  
cyccommute's Avatar
cyccommute
Mad bike riding scientist
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 29,137
Likes: 6,186
From: Denver, CO

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Originally Posted by FBinNY
It isn't only a matter of steering geometry. A rigid fork will be roughly 3" shorter axle to crown than a comparable 65mm travel suspension fork. That drops the entire front end of the bike 3", changing not only the steering geometry, but also the handlebar height, which can be an issue for many people.

It'll also lower pedal to ground clearance by 1" or so. So while it may not be necessary to buy a suspension compensated fork, but people should be aware of possibly unanticipated consequences.
It's 2.5" and you have to take into account the fork sag which is about 1/3 of the fork travel. That makes the effect front end height difference 1.6" and the pedals clearance would be reduced by roughly 0.5". Not a big enough difference to worry about. Since a rigid fork has to have some height for tire clearance anyway, it is likely that nothing would change at all.
__________________
Stuart Black
Dreamin' of Bemidji Down the Mississippi (in part)
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!





cyccommute is offline  
Reply