Thread: SLR cameras?
View Single Post
Old 07-25-10 | 08:53 PM
  #8  
benajah
One legged rider
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 1
From: Moraga, CA

Bikes: Kuota Kharma, Surly LHT, CAAD9, Bianchi fg/ss

Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe
Unless you are a pro shooter or otherwise make money from your photography, 2 SLR's is overkill.

If you have the budget I'd pick up one (yes, one) Micro Four Thirds camera -- Olympus E-PL1 or Panasonic GF1. They're small, light, unobtrusive and produce excellent results as they use a DSLR-sized sensor. I'd couple that with a high-end P&S (e.g. Canon G11). If that is not an option, I'd bring one DSLR and whatever other lens(es) you need, plus the P&S.

For the laptop, if you absolutely need to edit the images while in transit I'd pick up a netbook with a large hard drive ($400?) and a small backup USB drive ($75). Alternately you can get a stand-alone hard drive (e.g. Jobo Giga) to copy images from the camera. Make sure to copy your image files to the backup drive regularly.

I would use a water-resistant handlebar bag to carry the cameras, e.g. Ortlieb. Those pop off easily and even have a lock, if you're paranoid. Put the cameras and the backup hard drive in there and pad it, and leave the laptop in the panniers.

There isn't much need for a hardshell case, if you get hit hard enough that a hardshell would help, your cameras are the least of your worries.

I also don't see much need to worry about theft, once you get out of the big cities, bike tourers rarely get robbed.
If a guy is carrying 2 SLRs, a selection of commonly mounted lenses, and a laptop, I say its a safe assumption that he is serious about his photography and needs the full kit he is carrying.
benajah is offline  
Reply