View Single Post
Old 05-02-05 | 04:46 PM
  #138  
joejack951's Avatar
joejack951
Senior Member
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,103
Likes: 96
From: Wilmington, DE

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Originally Posted by closetbiker
I also have to wonder at why it is that in this day, we worry about helmet use. Helmet use among U.S. cyclists was nearly non-existent before the 1990's. Does it make sense that all those parents for all those years encouraged their children to ride a bike around the neighbourhood or to school if they thought head injuries were likely to happen to them? Riding a bike was an All-American activity. Nobody wore helmets in the 80's and before. There was also the excellent product known as the Bell Biker. The Bell Biker helmet was introduced in '75 and it was not much less protective than today's helmets. Very few people wore Bell Bikers. Could it be because cyclists had yet to be marketed to? After Greg LeMond had such a high profile after his Tour wins, the sell (and snow job) was on.

As I've said before, I believe it's all about the perception of risk that's been manafactured to sell a product at the expense of teaching safe riding skills as a first safety measure.
Back in the day, no one wore seatbelts either. Are you saying that seatbelts are just a marketing ploy? What about football helmets? Why don't guys just wear those old leather ones any more?

The advances with plastics and manufacturing in general has made for a lot of great new products. Back in the '80s, it probably wasn't economically feasible to make a lightweight, breathable helmet for $30. Now it is so they sell lots of them.
joejack951 is offline