Originally Posted by noisebeam
But lots on inappropriate innuedeo about all these other guest worker cyclists who don't follow the rules, no lights, wrong way. Sets the stage, the presumption that she must have been doing something wrong. Also the comment about her not wearing a helmet. Since when did helmets stop cars from rear ending cyclists?
Wait. Hold on. I perceived the intent of the original post to criticise the law or rather interpretation of the law. Personally, I don't think there was enough information given to criticise. It's also obvious that the media is fairly clueless and somewhat biased. Which one are we complaining about in this case?