Originally Posted by
tjspiel
Not quite the same. GM owned SAAB and Volvo and certainly influenced the direction of those car makers for better or worse, but they were distinct car makers that retained their heritage, designs, and a good portion of their facilities and staff. SAAB has since been bought by Spyker.
I just see things differently than a lot of 'serious' cyclists.
I have 10's of thousands of miles in four states and the more I pile on
the more I lament how unecessarilly complicated I made it on myself and
possibly other people through that time when in reality its beyond simple.
I feel (please dont take this offensively, cuz its not meant to be) that we
over-complicate stuff to others when we are trying to sell biking as an
alternative to the painful status quo. When 'serious' guys say you
"NEED' certain stuff, at this point I usually feel that that stuff is not
entirely necessary, but thats for a differnt thread. Relating to this one,
we should not discourage someone by petty semantics. The BD bikes
are as useable and quality per dollar spent as any in an LBS. I dont
think we shoulb be discouraging people by opining what is good or
bad at this level. If it was a WAL*MART bike, I would say "Yes" give
an opinion because they are too disposable to rely on for serious
road work. But a BD bike is a very useable item in any circumstance.
Mine went through the salt slush and mud season of Vermont with
only a few flats. Between the bombed out roads and the miles needed to
get ANYWHERE in VT, I think thats a pretty good test as to a bikes
worthiness. I say, tell people all is good , just do it !
