Originally Posted by
Oregon Southpaw
While I was at my LBS yesterday I decided to check out some of the high-zoot bikes. On one level I appreciate things about them that make them more "useable" - compact cranks, brifters, dual-pivot brakes - are a good example. But with these advances (I use this term loosely) comes the expense, and from what I've heard, lack of durability.
Been a few weeks since the last "bash the new stuff" thread - I was beginning to get concerned.
Aesthetics and cost aside, brakes and shifters are real, huge advances - no need to qualify the statement with the term "loosely". As to lack of durability, that is a misconception - with the possible exception of low-end Shimano brifters (ut even they last for 1000's and 1000's of miles). My modern Campy cranks, brakes, etc, will last for a long, long time, and if the brifters finally fail even after as little as 20,000 miles or so, big deal - I'll buy another set for $150 or thereabouts. They are more than worth it for the ride quality improvements and enjoyability.
Crash damage is a whole 'nother kettle of fish, but I've seen plenty of that with the "old school" stuff, so it's a wash.