View Single Post
Old 08-22-10 | 11:47 PM
  #69  
fuji86
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
From: Flagler Palm Coast, FL

Bikes: 1986 Fuji Allegro 12 Spd; 2015 Bianchi Kuma 27.2 24 Spd; 1997 Fuji MX-200 21 Spd; 2010 Vilano SS/FG 46/16

And I'm not taking it as an argument or trying to be argumentative. As I read more on it I learn too, consider this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_helmet

Design intentions and standards

Both are intended to reduce acceleration to the head due to impact, as a stiff liner made of expanded polystyrene liner is crushed against the head.[12][13]
Standards involve the use of an instrumented headform which is dropped, wearing a helmet, onto various anvils. The speed of impact is designed to simulate the effect of a rider's head falling from approximately usual riding height, without rotational energy and without impact from another vehicle.[14][15]
As noted earlier, collision energy varies with the square of impact speed. A typical helmet is designed to absorb the energy of a head falling from a bicycle, hence an impact speed of around 12 mph or 20 km/h. This will only reduce the energy of a 30 mph or 50 km/h impact to the equivalent of 27.5 mph or 45 km/h, and even this will be compromised if the helmet fails.[citation needed] As a subsidiary effect, they should also spread point impacts over a wider area of the skull. Hard shell helmets may do this better, but are heavier and less well ventilated. They are more common among stunt riders than road riders or mountain bikers. Additionally, the helmet should reduce superficial injuries to the scalp. Hard shell helmets may also reduce the likelihood of penetrating impacts, although these are very rare.
Even the foam helmet is inadequate protection for a real world collision.

Same wiki:

In 1990 the Consumers' Association (UK) market survey showed that around 90 % of helmets on sale were Snell B90 certified. By their 1998 survey the number of Snell certified helmets was around zero.

Last edited by fuji86; 08-22-10 at 11:51 PM.
fuji86 is offline