Originally Posted by
Nerull
So why did you have to photoshop the logos on your Fuji?
Sure, a completely out of place blur is going to show up. Now try one that's well done.
Here is a completely untouched image I took earlier this year. Now, pretend you had no idea about the authenticity, what would you say, based on just the ELA?
http://errorlevelanalysis.com/permalink/10c1f80/
It has the features of the original image being discussed - edge highlights, dark sky, red standing out like a sore thumb - things you've cited as evidence parts of the image were retouched.
Yeah, it's looking like ela is better for real alterations like adding lipstick or changing the shape. Especially pasting from other images.
I still think the original on page one is legit motion blur.