View Single Post
Old 08-26-10 | 09:16 AM
  #5  
merlinextraligh's Avatar
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,812
Likes: 1,234
From: Jacksonville

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Hey Venturous, where in WV?

We've never ridden a Da Vinci, but have ridden a number of times with people that have them.

I'd say that rdtompki's post is a pretty fair summary of what I've observed, and heard from Davinci riders.

The system offers an advantage for certain teams, most notably teams with less experienced stokers.

But there are a number of drawbacks, particularly if you're looking to go fast, such as weight, complexity, expense, difficulty climbing out of the saddle, difficulty sprinting out of the saddle.

Also, someone correct me if I'm wrong, but if the Stoker pedals a slower cadence than the Captain, the Stoker is essentially freewheeling, like riding a bike downhill when you're not pedaling fast enough to actually engage the freehub. Thus the system allows independent coasting, but it still really doesn't address mismatched cadence preference.

So, if you're a team of two, strong, experienced cyclists, and want to ride fast, it seems there is no great benefit, and some significant draawbacks.

If going fast, climbing out of the saddle, sprinting, etc, doesn't matter to you, and the ICS accomodates your team's particular needs then it can be a reasonable choice.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Reply