View Single Post
Old 09-04-10, 06:13 PM
  #19  
bradtx
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pearland, Texas
Posts: 7,579

Bikes: Cannondale, Trek, Raleigh, Santana

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 308 Post(s)
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
91MF, The cantilever rear debuted on the 3.0 frame, which appeared in 1989. With the steel fork it made sense to have a crit model with it's straight diameter downtube (stiffened the HT shell) and steeper head tube. The aluminum fork has a little less kick out which made a SR frame as nearly quick turning as the steel fork CR frame and the aluminum fork reportedly made a CR frame a bit twitchy at first, I can't say I noticed any difference. The CR was dropped around '92 because it simply wasn't needed.

BGirl, As far as I was aware the SR and the CR had the same BB height, the ST had a lower BB. There is also a CR300, which was sold as a frameset, this is what my '89 is. CR wheelbase is a bit shorter simply because of the steeper head tube, but the difference is slight. I wasn't aware that a BL could be had as a CR, but seems they could be... comparing the pics in post 1 and 17.

Brad

Last edited by bradtx; 09-04-10 at 06:40 PM. Reason: bass akwards
bradtx is offline