View Single Post
Old 09-20-10, 12:58 PM
  #19  
Talldog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 463

Bikes: Several

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by meanwhile
I don't think the Trek FX is really of this genre - the clearances are too wide as remember, the crank "Q factor" too high, and the steering angle is wrong. It's more like a flat barred tourer with v-brakes.
Actually, my 7.9FX (105 cranks) has less measured Q factor than my Trek 1500 road racer. Head angle varies between 71.5 to 72.5 on the 7.9FX depending on frame size. Lots of road racers with head angles like that. Have never checked my 7.5FX but my guess is that it is not spec'd the same as the 7.9FX vis a vis crank Q and such. But I suppose I could actually check instead of just assuming it to be so.
Talldog is offline