View Single Post
Old 10-11-10 | 03:08 PM
  #34  
noglider's Avatar
noglider
aka Tom Reingold
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 44,320
Likes: 6,605
From: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA

Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem

It seems that most steel frames have more than adequate fatigue life for most riders. So far, most aluminum frames are holding up well, too. If the fatigue life is as good as steel, that's good, but the failure mode of steel is preferable. Steel warns you for a long time before it fails.

That's not to say I recommend against aluminum frames. I own two. I don't ride terribly hard, and I have so many bikes that I don't ride any one bike very much, so I'm not a good frame lifespan tester.

The only experience I have with carbon fiber bikes is as a test rider.

And I have no experience with titanium frames.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog

“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author

Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
noglider is offline  
Reply