Originally Posted by
slowandsteady
I didn't realize that "tattooed individual" was a group, class, or category. It certainly isn't recognized as a group by the law and therefore is legal to "discriminate" against as is how a person dresses on a job interview.
Originally Posted by
Fleabiscuit
Trying to reason or talk sense to morons is a lesson in futility. Your time would be better served trying to negotiate peace in the middle east or solving world hunger...you know, something easier to accomplish.
I wish the young guy with the "sweet" sleeves sweating it out wearing long sleeves at the company picnic, and the tat "artist", knocking out another tramp stamp on some clueless teenager, all the best.
Cheers!
FB
oh sorry, I didn't realize discrimination was solely a legal term. I didn't realize it could also have something to do with morals and ethics. By assuming that anyone with a tattoo is a degenerate, you are creating a group. The fact Flea Biscuit discriminates and is a bigot has nothing to do with the law, and everything to do with the fact he's worthless as a human being.