View Single Post
Old 10-20-10 | 05:49 PM
  #14  
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
Carbonfiberboy
just another gosling
Titanium Club Membership
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 20,538
Likes: 2,656
From: Everett, WA

Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004

Originally Posted by SBRDude
On my upcoming credit card tour (i.e., no camping equipment), I'm planning on using Lone Peak bags, which are not waterproof. The P-100s are 2000 cubic inches per pair and weigh 36 oz. A similarly sized set of Ortliebs - Sport Packer Classic is a little smaller at 1831 ci and weights 53 oz, which is just over a pound more. A pound is not a lot, but all of the gear and clothing choices come with weight tradeoffs and an argument can always be made that the heavier selection comes with a worthwhile benefit. Everyone has to decide that for themselves. For me, after reading about waterproof vs. non-waterproof panniers, I decided that non-waterproof panniers with a couple lightweight dry bags inside would do the trick.

Also, to the person who said that an extra 5 lbs doesn't make a difference on the hills, I beg to differ. Perhaps it isn't as noticeable to some people, but for the type of riding I usually do it makes a genuine difference.

EDIT: I also thought about just strapping on a sturdy dry bag to a rack instead of using any panniers, but I was concerned that it might end up rubbing and falling apart or at least getting torn. Not sure if that is a valid concern or not.
We strap a waterproof compression sack to our rack top. But under it, we put a piece of ribbed rubber stair tread material which was zip-tied to the SS rack. So no wear on the sack or rack, and the ribbing kept it from sliding beautifully. The same material makes great mudflaps, too. For $10 you can get a life-time supply.
Carbonfiberboy is offline  
Reply