Originally Posted by
SBRDude
On my upcoming credit card tour (i.e., no camping equipment), I'm planning on using Lone Peak bags, which are not waterproof. The P-100s are 2000 cubic inches per pair and weigh 36 oz. A similarly sized set of Ortliebs - Sport Packer Classic is a little smaller at 1831 ci and weights 53 oz, which is just over a pound more. A pound is not a lot, but all of the gear and clothing choices come with weight tradeoffs and an argument can always be made that the heavier selection comes with a worthwhile benefit. Everyone has to decide that for themselves. For me, after reading about waterproof vs. non-waterproof panniers, I decided that non-waterproof panniers with a couple lightweight dry bags inside would do the trick.
Also, to the person who said that an extra 5 lbs doesn't make a difference on the hills, I beg to differ. Perhaps it isn't as noticeable to some people, but for the type of riding I usually do it makes a genuine difference.
EDIT: I also thought about just strapping on a sturdy dry bag to a rack instead of using any panniers, but I was concerned that it might end up rubbing and falling apart or at least getting torn. Not sure if that is a valid concern or not.
We strap a waterproof compression sack to our rack top. But under it, we put a piece of ribbed rubber stair tread material which was zip-tied to the SS rack. So no wear on the sack or rack, and the ribbing kept it from sliding beautifully. The same material makes great mudflaps, too. For $10 you can get a life-time supply.